In servis suis consolabitur Deus.God shall find His consolation in His servants.
Servitus
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit Servitus's Xanga Site!

Message: message me


Member Since: 10/22/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
ProtestantWitness
madam_librarian
PistachioChocolateWife
MarkMZima
ContemplataTradere
Paleocrat_etc
Only_Truth_12
kierkegaardsmom
Ebrulf
Daveyh8
GordonBOPS
Saint_Athanasius
MysteriumFidei

Blogrings
Catholics for the Tridentine Rite
previous - random - next

Traditional Catholics
previous - random - next

Society of St. Pius X
previous - random - next

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus
previous - random - next

Fatima Crusaders
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Monday, July 27, 2009

Time for another post - couldn't resist this.  (From The Remnant)

A Laughable Double Standard
The Duke University-Rape Case Nobody Knows About


Oliver Sykes
GUEST COLUMNIST


When the Duke University-lacrosse-rape story broke in the spring of 2006, it sparked massive media coverage nationwide for more than two years and endless liberal posturing about white privilege vs. a disadvantaged black woman – three Duke lacrosse players were charged with raping and kidnapping a black stripper. It all turned out to be a lie, as we now know, and the politically correct house of cards collapsed. The liberal media quickly moved on with few regrets about a rush to judgment.

Now there is another Duke University-rape story with a strong evidence trail of e-mails, photos, and videos, as well as investigative work by the FBI, an Internet Crimes Against Children task force, the State Bureau of Investigation, and police forces in Washington, D.C. and in Durham, N.C.  But this time, the liberal media aren’t saying much.

That’s because this case involves a homosexual Duke University official who does AIDS research; who lives with his partner in a sexually liberated and eco-friendly housing community; who adopted two black boys; who allegedly drugged and sodomized one of the boys; who allegedly broadcast the sodomy online; and who reportedly offered the 5-year-old boy up to other gay abusers on the Internet.

This is not a politically correct storyline: ‘Gay White Duke Official Rapes Adopted Black Boy.’ It doesn’t fit the liberal worldview. ‘Angry White Male Rapes Black Girl’ does – but that’s not the story here. Thus the meager media coverage. Let’s look at what’s known so far.

Frank Lombard, 42, is the associate director of the Center for Health Policy at Duke University where he does a lot of patients-with-HIV/AIDS research and brings in grant money: for example, $4 million in 2007. He also teaches undergraduate courses, as listed for 2009, including “Introduction to the United States Health Care System” and “Health Policy Analysis.”

Lombard lives at the Eno Commons with his partner Ken Shipp, a pharmacist who also works at Duke doing HIV/AIDS research. Eno Commons is a cohousing neighborhood in Durham, which was developed by lesbian activist Sherri Zann Rosenthal, also the assistant city attorney for Durham.

Enos Commons describes itself as “embracing diversity” and welcoming to “residents of all ages, races, religious beliefs, and affectional preferences.” It says it is open to lesbian, gay, bisexual and/or transgender members and has no restrictions on romantic relations between consenting adults. It also describes itself as a “Paradise for Children” who “learn what they live.”

The FBI, the police, and U.S. attorneys first learned about Lombard through a “confidential source,” as explained in a sworn statement by Detective Timothy Palchak, who works for the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, assigned to the Northern Virginia Regional Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.

The confidential source, or “CS,” was facing child pornography charges and decided to cooperate with investigators about other people involved “in the sexual abuse and molestation of children.”

CS stated that he used the Internet-based video chat program ICUii (I See You Too) to talk with a person with the user name “cooper2” and “cooperse.” According to Palchak’s statement, the following was determined:

 - Officials with ICUii, under subpoena, “provided information that the ICUii account of ‘cooper2’ belongs to Frank Lombard.” ICUii “listed Frank Lombard’s email address” and his telephone number, and also indicated “that Frank Lombard’s profile description stated he was interested in ‘perv fam fun,’ a reference to incestuous child molestation.”

 - ICUii also disclosed to the FBI that a customer had complained back in January 2007 that, in chatting with Lombard on ICUii, “Lombard told the complainant that he ‘was into incest’ and that he had adopted two African-American children.”

 - “The complainant also explained that Frank Lombard described himself, in his profile, as being a ‘perv dad for fun.’”

 -  CS said he met cooper2 about four years ago through ICUii and they corresponded every few weeks, and CS had seen cooper2 “over webcam as many as one hundred times.”

 - CS witnessed cooper2 “perform oral sex on an African-American child who appeared to be under the age of ten, and [too graphic to print], all of which activity was displayed to CS using the individual’s webcam.”

 - Cooper 2 also, according to CS, advised “that he lived in the Raleigh/Durham area of North Carolina; that the child was an adopted child, one of two adopted African-American children; that he had a live-in gay male partner who did not participate in the sexual abuse; and that he had allowed other individuals to sexually molest the child.”

As the statement continues, Palchak says that he engaged in an undercover operation using the online chat program Yahoo! Instant Messenger and chatted with a person using the “display name ‘F L.’”  Sections of Palchak’s statement read:

 - FL used the “photo share” feature of Yahoo! Instant Messenger and sent to the detective “nude photos of himself, which pictures match the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

 - “User with the display name ‘F L’ stated that he had sexually molested his adopted, male, African-American child who he had adopted as an infant and is currently five-years old.”

 - “He advised Your affiant [Palchak] in particular that the child had performed oral sex on him, he had ‘fingered’ the child, and that he had [too graphic to print].

 - “He also advised … that he has met other pedophiles on the program ICUii at times when he was willing to display his adopted child on that program.”

 - “He further stated that the abuse of the child was easier when the child was too young to talk or know what was happening, but that he had drugged the child with Benadryl during the molestation.”

 - “ ‘F L’ invited your affiant to fly to Durham this week in order to have sexual contact with his 5-year-old adopted child. ‘F L’ stated to Your affiant that there would be no limits on the sexual activity he could engage in with his 5-year-old adopted child.”

 - “During this conversation, ‘F L’ was fully visible over the webcam, including his face. ‘F L’ is identical to the North Carolina driver’s license photograph of Frank Mccorkle Lombard.”

Lombard was arrested on June 24. He is charged with offering up his 5-year-old adopted son for sex to other people (U.S. Code Section 2422(a). The maximum penalty for such a crime is 20 years imprisonment.

One would think that the arrest of a prominent Duke University official for such a heinous crime would spark a lot of major media coverage. After all, this is the same Duke University that the media (and Duke’s liberal faculty members) went batty over with the lacrosse-rape story – a story based on one woman’s unsubstantiated allegation, which quickly fell apart.

But that story was so politically correct – three young white men allegedly rape a poor, young black woman in the South – the maniacal liberal media would not let it go. It fit all their stereotypes and their political agenda.

The gay and eco-friendly Frank Lombard who adopts black boys and then allegedly sodomizes one of them on Web-cam does not fit the liberal media’s stereotypes or their agenda.

Let’s look at the numbers.  In the 15 days following Lombard’s arrest, a search of the Nexis news service database (search term “Frank Lombard” and “Duke University”) shows that 19 news stories were published. Most of that coverage was in small, local newspapers and was cursory.

In the 15 days that followed the arrest of two Duke lacrosse players, on April 18, 2006, there were 1,056 news stories. (Nexis search for “Duke University” and “lacrosse” and “rape.”) (The third lacrosse player was not arrested until May 15.)

And in the few weeks prior to those arrests, following the woman’s Mar. 14, 2006, claim that she was raped, there were an additional 1,367 stories. All of that included extensive coverage on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, Fox News Channel, National Public Radio, NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, and all the major newspapers and magazines. The coverage was wall-to-wall.

Yet a fairly prominent gay Duke University official is nabbed in an FBI child-sex sting and there are 19 news stories. Two Duke lacrosse players get arrested for supposedly raping a stripper and there are more than 2,400 stories. There’s something wrong with this picture.

Does anyone doubt that if a prominent straight man at Duke University had adopted a young black girl and then sexually abused her and broadcast the abuse over the Internet, it would not be big news?

The coverage would again be wall-to-wall.

But here’s the reality. The liberal media support homosexuality. Stories that in any way undermine the media’s rosy picture of homosexuality are usually not given wide coverage.

Lombard lives in a sexually progressive commune with his gay partner. A story that undermines the liberal image of the committed gay couple – in this case, two highly educated Duke university employees – living comfortably in suburbia is not to be promoted.

Lombard adopted two black boys. A story that in any way taints the liberal picture of gay adoption is not to be promoted, and especially not promoted if the story has a race component (white male father, black sons).

Lombard allegedly drugged one of his sons and then sexually abused him on more than one occasion, and allegedly allowed others to abuse the boy.  A gay man drugging and sodomizing his own son does not help advance the gay agenda, so it gets little coverage.

At the same time, the story is so morally revolting it can only taint anyone or anything associated with it – that includes Duke University, Eno Commons, the city of Durham, the gay community in general and the liberal media who rabidly covered the Duke lacrosse scandal story.

Bottom line for liberal media:  White males allegedly rape black woman in the South equals politically correct story, lots of coverage.  Gay man adopts and then allegedly sodomizes his black son equals politically incorrect story, very little coverage.

The good news in all this? The two children adopted by Lombard are now with the North Carolina Department of Social Services. Hopefully, they will get the counseling they need and, God willing, a real mother and father to adopt them.


Sunday, May 10, 2009

Bishop Williamson makes a good point:

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Eleison Comments XCVI: Flat Contradiction

Ever since, with the Second Vatican Council, Catholic Authority and Catholic Truth substantially parted company, the Catholics who clung to Authority have had problems with the Truth, and the Catholics who clung to Truth have had problems with Catholic Authority. What could be more logical? Catholics on both sides long for a reunion. Especially amongst decent Conciliar Catholics, this takes the concrete form of the ardent wish that Pope Benedict XVI and the Society of St. Pius X come to an understanding.

Well and good. But there is a problem. Vatican II contradicts Catholic Truth, outside of which Catholic Authority dissolves, is now dissolving, because its Divine Master, Our Lord Jesus Christ, is "the Way, the Truth and the Life" (Jn. XIV,6). For proof of the contradiction, read for instance Michael Davies' The Second Vatican Council and Religious Liberty, where he shows that while the Catholic Church has always taught that no man has a true right not to be prevented from propagating error, Vatican II (Dignitatis Humanae") taught that every man has a true right not to be prevented from propagating error (save public order - see Davies' Chapter XXII in particular). The contradiction is direct.

At first sight it may seem unimportant, because what does it matter if a few nutcases more or less spout nonsense in public? But in fact the difference between the right and the non-right to propagate error is all the difference between Hollywood's candy-on-a-leash deity, and the Lord God of Hosts, whose thunder and lightning struck terror into the hearts of the Israelites even miles distant from his flaming Mount Sinai (Exodus XX, 18-21).

For indeed all human action follows on some thought. Thought is uttered between men, or socialized, mainly with words. Thus the being and action of any human society hangs on exchanges of words. Therefore either truth and error are of no importance to any society's existence and direction in those exchanges, or any society must control public speech in its midst, at least sufficiently to check significant transmission of significant error.

Now the only limit set by Vatican II to public discourse is that it should not disturb "public order". So for Vatican II, any heresy or blasphemy may be uttered in public so long as the police do not have to be called in, and any deity that may exist must bow down before this "freedom and dignity of the human person"! On the contrary the Lord God of Sinai, the Holy Trinity whose Second Person is Jesus Christ, tells us we will answer for every idle word (Mt. XII, 36), and even for sinful thoughts (Mt.V, 28). So in accordance with God's Truth (and so long as it will do more good than harm), Catholic society checks the public propagation of error against Faith or morals. Kyrie eleison.

London, England


Saturday, February 28, 2009

An excellent treatment of the concept of "anti-semitism" by Fr. Denis Fahey.  At this particular time in history, his books (which all have an imprimatur) should be required reading for all Catholics.

On Anti-Semitism
by Father Denis Fahey, C.S.S.p., B.A., D. Ph.D, D.D.
On account of the confusion of mind prevalent among Catholics concerning the question of Anti-Semitism, a few words must be said about it.
In the excellent review of my book The Kingship of Christ or Organized Naturalism which appeared in the Jesuit magazine, La Civilta Cattolica (Rome, March, 1947), the reviewer laid special stress on the distinction which I have been making in all my books. He wrote as follows:
"The author wants a clear distinction to be made between hatred of the Jewish nation, which is Anti-Semitism, and opposition to the Jewish and Masonic naturalism. This opposition on the part of Catholics must be mainly positive by acknowledging, not only individually, but socially, the rights of the supernatural Kingship of Christ and His Church, and by striving politically to get these rights acknowledged by States and public life. For this indispensable undertaking ... the active and effective union of Catholics ... is absolutely necessary."
Space does not allow of lengthy quotations from papal documents to show that, on the one hand, the sovereign pontiffs insist that Catholics must stand unflinchingly for the integral rights of Christ the King as contained in the papal encyclicals, while, on the other hand, keeping their minds and hearts free from hatred of Our Lord's own nation according to the flesh. On the one hand, they must battle for the rights of Christ the King and the supernatural organization of society a laid down in the encyclical Quas Primas, unequivocally proclaiming that the rejection of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the True Messias, by His own nation, and the unyielding opposition of that nation to Him, are a fundamental source of disorder and conflict in the world. On the other hand, as members of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Catholics should neither hate the members of that nation in which, through our Blessed Mother, the Lily of Israel, the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity assumed human nature, nor deny them their legitimate rights as persons.
The supernatural elevation of mind and heart and the unshrinking fortitude that are required from members of Christ in our day can be maintained only with the aid of Him who wept over Jerusalem's rejection of order. It will inevitably mean suffering for Christ's faithful members as the power of the anti-supernatural forces in the world increases. Even in the midst of their suffering, however, Christ's members must bear in mind that there will be a glorious triumph for Christ the King.
Two reasons can be assigned for the fact that Our Lord's faithful members will often be betrayed by those who should be on the side of Christ the King. Firstly, many Catholic writers speak of papal condemnations of Anti-Semitism without explaining the meaning of the term and never even allude to the documents which insist on the rights of Our Divine Lord, Head of the Mystical Body, Priest and King. Thus, very many are completely ignorant of the duty incumbent on all Catholics of standing positively for Our Lord's reign in society in opposition to Jewish naturalism.
The result is that numbers of Catholics are so ignorant of Catholic doctrine that they hurl the accusation of Anti-Semitism against those who are battling for the rights of Christ the King thus effectively aiding the enemies of Our Divine Lord. Secondly, many Catholic writers copy unquestioningly what they read in the naturalistic or anti-supernatural Press and do not distinguish between Anti-Semitism in the correct Catholic sense, as explained above, and "Anti- Semitism," as the Jews understand it. For the Jews, "Anti-Semitism" is anything that is in opposition to the naturalistic Messianic domination of their nation over all the others. Quite logically, the leaders of the Jewish nation hold that to stand for the Rights of Christ the King is to be "Anti-Semitic."
The term "Anti-Semitism," with all its war-connotation in the minds of the unthinking, is being extended to include any form of opposition to the Jewish nation's naturalistic aims and any exposure of the methods they adopt to achieve these aims.
At the beatification of Joan of Arc (Dec. 13, 1908), the saintly Pope Pius X said:

"In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of those disposed toward evil is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigor of Satan's reign is due to the easygoing weakness of Catholics. Oh! if I might ask the Divine Redeemer, as the Prophet Zachary did in spirit (Zach. 13:6a): "What are those wounds in the midst of Thy hands?" The answer would not be doubtful: "...With these I was wounded in the house of them that loved me" (Zach. 13:6b). I was wounded by my friends, who did nothing to defend me, and who, on every occasion, made themselves the accomplices of my adversaries. And this reproach can be leveled at the weak and timid Catholics of all countries."

- Denis Fahey, C.S.Sp.
Feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus
June 16, 1950


Sunday, February 08, 2009

Following in the steps of Our Lord (Jn. XVIII, 23) and St. Paul (Acts, XXIII, 5), Archbishop Lefebvre gave his Society the example of never so cleaving to God's Truth as to abandon respect for the men holding God's Authority. In the midst of last week's media uproar, surely aimed rather at the Holy Father than at a relatively insignificant bishop, here is a letter written to Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos on January 28 by that bishop:

To His Eminence Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos

Your Eminence

Amidst this tremendous media storm stirred up by imprudent remarks of mine on Swedish television, I beg of you to accept, only as is properly respectful, my sincere regrets for having caused to yourself and to the Holy Father so much unnecessary distress and problems.

For me, all that matters is the Truth Incarnate, and the interests of His one true Church, through which alone we can save our souls and give eternal glory, in our little way, to Almighty God. So I have only one comment, from the prophet Jonas, I, 12:

"Take me up and throw me into the sea; then the sea will quiet down for you; for I know it is because of me that this great tempest has come upon you."

Please also accept, and convey to the Holy Father, my sincere personal thanks for the document signed last Wednesday and made public on Saturday. Most humbly I will offer a Mass for both of you.

Sincerely yours in Christ 

+Richard Williamson


Thursday, January 22, 2009

Pro-Life Rally

Well, we attended the annual pro-life rally this evening in front of the local Planned Parenthood abortion clinic.  This is the biggie, falling as it does on the anniversary of Roe vs. Wade.  I thought it was going to be a mass of humanity - I thought the election and installation of such a beast would bring Christians and Catholics in particular out the woodwork by the hoards.  This was hardly the case.  This is a large metropolis, with probably sixty or seventy Catholic parishes, and I would estimate there were only about 1200 people who showed up.  Of course, the vast majority of these were novus ordo Catholics, who didn't seem to have much, if any cohesion or direction.  I felt sorry for their representative priest as he tried to get them to sing banal novus ordo/protestant hymns.  Our group felt sorry for him, and and least lip-synched or tried to mumble the words.  Then he deferred to our priest to lead the Rosary, possibly because our priest had the foresight to bring a microphone.  He led us in the sorrowful mysteries, and in-between decades we sang the Glory Be in Latin, and we ended each decade singing the Ave Maria in Latin.  Our voices were strong and beautiful and transformed the entire event to one of order, purpose, prayer, and beauty.  

Following the Rosary, the representative priest and other notables from the novus ordo parishes tried in earnest to convince us to attend the rest of the event over at the college campus, but no one from our parish wanted to go because they were going to have Christian rock bands, which is really not our cup of tea.  But I found it very interesting and sad in a way that they seemed to sense they were missing out on something that we had.  They wanted to keep that going.  All the more surprising because our priest is a member of the Society of St. Pius X, and they were aware of this.  I think the contrast between the traditional way of doing things and the novus ordo chaos was just too obvious.  My heart really broke for them, and I hope and pray that they can come to embrace tradition so that they too can experience the joy and confidence that comes through being a part of the Traditional Catholic Church.



Next 5 >>